New line?
Is it safe to assume that this is not the new product in the PhotoBridge line that RokuAnthony suggested (in [u]this thread[/u]) would be released in late summer? If so, can we still expect a new PhotoBridge model soon?
TheEndless
The PNX1500 chipset it uses supports more video formats, which is a plus.
PNX 1500 info: 21136666
It has keyboard support too, and is meant for Kiosks. Now all it needs is VNCSix and we've got a silent $300 HD thin client for the kitchen or den.
However, it doesn't appear to have a MIPS CPU and the API is new and incompatible. However, moving to an interface-based API will definitely help the "you must rebuild 3rd-party apps with each firmware release" problem that the PhotoBridge has.
It doesn't appear to be running Linux, instead a real-time OS from Philips. Hackability seems lower than for the PB.
Perhaps most importantly, though, it has an external power supply! That is easy and cheap to replace should it ever give out.
Very interesting, hopefully other variations on the PhotoBridge emerge that are targeted more at the consumer market.
"fizze" wrote:
http://rokulabs.com/digital_brightsign.php
*cough*
"RokuAnthony" wrote:
We have not discontinued the PhotoBridge line of products. We are working on new PhotoBridge models. We have not officially announced these yet and have not committed to any particular release date. That said, it is likely that the first product from this development effort will launch in late summer.
"RokuAnthony" wrote:
That said, I think customer like your self will actually prefer the BrightSign line.
Based on its price and extendibility, there is no reason BrightSign can't be used as consumer product like you image.
"RokuAnthony" wrote:
The BrightSign does have much more features not yet exposed, such as MPEG4, H.264 video formats, and more that will be exposed via new APIs and features.
"RokuAnthony" wrote:
Hi Endless,
Yes, this is the product I was referring to in the post you reference. It is the beginning of a line of products based on the Philips Nexperia chips that are using our new RO based SDK. We discovered that there were different markets buying the PhotoBridge. Our goal is to target them with more specific products. One was "Digital Sign", for which BrightSign is targeted. Another is “consumer†which we also hope to have a more targeted product as well, but I can't give you a date yet. It won’t be this year. That said, I think customer like your self will actually prefer the BrightSign line.
Based on its price and extendibility, there is no reason BrightSign can't be used as consumer product like you image. We are targeting a major software update for Q1 2007 (target, not a promise) that would add the networking and other APIs needed to do everything I imagine you are envisioning. Then there is the issue of consumer-user applications. The Q1 ’07 SDK should have what is needed for this. Certainly 3rd parties can create them, and we haven’t decided yet if Roku will. The BrightSign does have much more features not yet exposed, such as MPEG4, H.264 video formats, and more that will be exposed via new APIs and features.
regards,
anthony
"TheEndless" wrote:
"RokuAnthony" wrote:
The BrightSign does have much more features not yet exposed, such as MPEG4, H.264 video formats, and more that will be exposed via new APIs and features.
Now that's exciting to hear!
"dj7675" wrote:
Still a bit unclear about the capabilities of the brightsign....can it or will it be able to do HD video over a network?
Or is there a new, not yet named Roku consumer device scheduled for early next year?
Thanks
Darin
"dj7675" wrote:
It would sure be nice to have a bit more clarity